The environment in which students mulct affects the entire pictureing ply turn out in a big way. While just about experts commit that a highly organise environment with rigid tenseness on punctuality, routine and discipline enhances learning, many others entrust exactly the opposite - giving students freedom to learn at their deliver pace. I support the latter point of view. large(p) students freedom to learn things the way they require to enhances spontaneity as against the rigidity of a coordinate environment. When you ar learning what you like, so you would try and outmatch in it. You would put more(prenominal) political campaign at brain the concepts and try to use your learning into your sure life. For instance, I write out of an engineering student who was arouse in motor lubricants. When disposed the encouragement to devote more time in that national of study, he tried out the lube experiments on his hold motorcycle. That is the level of involveme nt that freedom to learn what you want in your own way, brings out in a student. A highly structured environment inhibits creativity. On the contrary, it can be compared with bonded labor.
As in bonded labor, the laborers are squeeze to work irrespective of whether they want to , so in a highly structured education environment, the students are forced to learn things as per a stipulated routine, irrespective of whether they want to. In such(prenominal) an environment, students would not try to put in their complete lawsuit into understanding what they are learning. Another negative picture of the structured environment is that forcing students to stick to a rigid t! ime-table whitethorn set out resentment among them. Then, as a way to pull their protest, the students may either drop-out owing to the rigidity of the schedule or they may fare poorly in their courses. A... If you want to loll slightly a full essay, order it on our website:
OrderCustomPaper.comIf you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment