Monday, February 4, 2019
Sexuality in John Steinbecks The Chrysanthemums Essay -- Chrysanthemu
Sexuality in Steinbecks The Chrysanthemums Reading everywhere this excellent story once more, I am again fill up with the same emotion (if it can be called that) that I experienced when first of all schooling it. Steinbeck planned for that. In a letter to George Albee in 1933, Steinbeck comwork forcets on this story and his interest in Albees opinion of it. ...It is entirely different and is designed to strike without the readers knowledge. I mean he reads it casually and after it is blameless timbres that something profound has overhauled to him although he does not know what nor how. I knew after reading this, that Steinbeck is truly a marvel. It is one thing to have enough chance to leave your readers with this sense after theyve read something of yours, but to have it happen to them when youve actually planned it This is incredible. I was not the only person feel what Steinbeck had planned. And in that group, I was not the only one to want to nag apart this story to find out why I mat this way, what he intended me to feel, and what his story meant taking all things into consideration. when looking at various criticisms, I found a division line that could be made between the sexes. Most women agreed with me and felt the informal tenseness apparent in the story. This sexual tension was quiet and sensual. The only men that picked up on this picked out some overtly sexual innuendoes and chose to issue the subtleties as Elizas mood changes and tone of voice. The other men attributed any sexual tension to Elizas need for children, which is a valid point, but it ignores too many an(prenominal) other things in the story to fit it well. ... ...e predominantly male or predominantly female side, nor can they be pushed into little cubby holes that confine the different stereo-types of a woman. Her androgyny uses such stereo-types to define her, and to go over that and then use even more to define the end crossroad of the story would be a mistake. Works Cited Steinbeck, John. The Chrysanthemums 1937. Literature. Edgar V. Roberts and Henry E. Jacobs eds. London prentice Hall, 1998. Mitchell, Marylin L. Steinbecks Strong Women Feminine Identity in the Short Stories, Southwest Review, Vol. 61, no. 3, Summer, 1976, pp. 304-15. McMahah, Elizabeth E. The Chrysanthemums Study of a Womans Sexuality, Modern Fiction Studies, Vol. XIV, No 4. Winter, 1968-69, pp. 453-58. Hughes, R. S. John Steinbeck A Study of the Short Fiction. Boston Twayne Publishers, 1989.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment