Brechtian Performance †Message Delivery Essay

Our group explored and wontd a build of contrasting Brechtian techniques. Our chosen form of kindly improvement was safe sex, and we chose to use a parody of the sound-known Bible rumor of Genesis to hand over our message, hence juxtaposing contemporary society. We presented it with quite a lot of satire, with forcible buffoonery (the banana and the throwing of frock whilst Adam Ryan and eve Steph were behind the curtains) as well as verbal comedy (But divinity fudge said we could do anything but touch the bananas). This specimen of verbal comedy was to parody matinee idols command to non touch the apples in the book of the Bible. We to a fault had a fibber (Rebekka) who proved to be stiff and acted in the tendency of a Brechtian narrator. We had individuals step out of the group to address the audition in addition God (Jasmin) talked directly to the audience. This is a really popular Brechtian technique as it breaks the fourth wall and jars the audience. God an d the narrator excessively gave stage directions, an example of self-reference which is again jarring for the audience. Since we employ a scriptural story, in that respect is already the presence of God, who made the judgment on characters in the end and terminate make-up of epic theatre another Brechtian technique. Also, when God entered, the music We leave behind Rock You was played in the downplay, juxtaposing Gods holiness and earnestness and creating opportunities for comedy at the same clock.I think certain Brechtian techniques were employ quite well in our piece of epic theatre. By choosing the tale of Adam and evenn, we do not need introductions or monologues in effect for the audience to understand the characterizations of the roles even if not everyone is religious, I think it discharge be assumed that the whole of the audience are quite well-known(prenominal) with the basics of the tale. This allows the audience to be slow engaged in our performance. Our ph ysical and verbal uses of comedy was successful the audience understood the innuendos and showed this by laughing at the appropriate times. We to a fault presented the Bible view of contraception satirically, and in the end employ the narrator to tell the audience what the message very was to sire safe sex. Thus our egression of affectionate improvement was understandably understood by the audience. When God said to go forth and reckon, the narrator in like manner held up a placard that said = answer BABIES, another attempt at humor and too translating the Biblical style to make sure the audience could comprehend and sustain the story.Critically, I conceive we employed the Brechtian techniques well, but there is dormant a lot of direction for improvement. We used self-referencing both the narrator and God gave stage directions. The narrator also, whilst utterance to the audience, did not speak as herself or else, she used The narrator enters stage proper(ip) an d proceeds to tell the audience that this story is going to be approximately the issue of safe sex. This use of third person is jarring and useful. God also gave directions to turn the lights on and off, which made the theatre of our piece evident. However, there were a lot of opportunities to use more than(prenominal) Brechtian techniques, but we didnt. I note our use of juxtaposition wasnt particularly strong we could have used a contradicting type of music when Adam and Even were behind the curtains and throwing the clothes out instead of using the music we chose, which sum with the scene instead of contrasting it. Also, we only used frozen images, and not gestus Adam and Eve froze whe neer God and Satan entered, but it couldnt be called a imitation or summary of all the feelings and emotions depicted in the scene.Personally,I do not think my portrayal of Satan was up to its full potential. I didnt really use any Brechtian techniques in my role, and my wearing the Devil horns seemed to drain as a sidesplitting stereotypical presentation of Satan. I also think the narrator mightve given herself more stage directions at times to create an even more jarring and comical effect. For example, The narrator says the end to conclude the story. /pause/ The end. We did not really have time to try this out though, so it might not be a ripe idea and is merely what I wouldve wanted to try. I also feel we shouldve tried juxtaposing the sex scene to be more barbed and humorous perhaps with a classic, slow, romantic song, paired with the frantic throwing of the clothes. Again, our privation of organization meant we could not try that out, so it is only another personalised goal that I wanted to attempt. I wish to have explored more Brechtian techniques, especially in my own role. For example I couldve used a m take on perhaps a typical Halloween type of mask for a comical, stereotypical presentation.I think we synthesized our content with our form quite su ccessfully. Choosing the Biblical tale of Genesis as the base of our form was a good choice as we favourably parodied Gods commands and the audience could follow the story with ease. This form we chose was effective because it allowed us to employ a variety of Brechtian techniques. The use of physical comedy was also very effective the audience liked it and it was a sarcastic and humorous symbolism when Adam and Eve went behind the curtains. The use of the banana as a symbol was also very popular and the audience liked it. These uses of physical comedy were effective because we allowed the audience to piece things to placeher and realize the joke, thus devising it more amusing for them. The use of the narrators third person was also very well penalise as it jarred the audience they were not used to this and it made theatre more evident. Adam and Eve also stave in colloquial language, parodying the sophisticated Biblical text and making it more modernized, relating to the target ed audience. Overall the audience understood and appreciated the message we were trying to add together through, as well as our social improvement, thus I would study this as well synthesized.Our group did not use any fumble cutting, which I think is a very effective Brechtian technique. For example, for Tanishas group, whose social issue was the modern attitude to obesity, the use of cross cutting was executed very well. When Chloe was giving statistics about obesity and discussing facts about Tanya, Tanisha was at the background eating her Doritos. With this, we understand more easily what Chloe was saying it was like she was describing the Tanisha at the back. This also provided a lot of comedy and the audience laughed a lot. It could still be an example of juxtaposition and contrast, where Chloe was talking about how Tanyas checker was very fatal and she must be helped immediately, whilst Tanya was at the back on the button eating and eating.I also really like the use of t he legitimate song in the Gay Marriage group, and feel like we could have employed that technique too. YMCA is a song we, the audience, all know, and changing the lyrics to fit their own message was very successful. It was effective because we understood right by that they were gay and supported gay rights, and it was also very amusing as the lyrics to our well-known song are not changed in such a way. More comedy was created by their stylized acting Georgia, Amalissa and Charlotte were so knockout when singing the song, like it was an anthem and such which made it more humorous for us. The use of making up your own lyrics to a well-known breed is, I feel, a very effective Brechtian technique, as the audience would easily understand and would also find it very funny.The exponent relationships demonstrated in Coras group was also something I wouldve wanted to use. Their social issue was bullying, and the bullies stood on chairs and towered over Cinderella, who was backed up ag ainst the wall. This is a very notable and popular Brechtian technique in demonstrating power and I find this very effective. This explicit exaggeration of statuses makes the audience question the otherwise normal relationship. Weve perform so used to bullying that we know its wrong, yet we never really question the immorality of it or how to stop it anymore. Having the bullies stand on chairs and Cinderella cowering in fear was like a wake-up call we see the power relationship and we see how wrong it is. Hence this was an effective way to get the social improvement across to the audience.Lastly, I really liked how Tanishas group broke the fourth wall. When the two contestants introduced themselves, we were given operating instructions to clap and give a round of applause. This made the theatre of the piece very evident the audience is actually joining in and somehow taking part in the performance we provided the applause. This technique is very effective because it jars the audience and makes them realize they are construeing a piece of theatre. I would like to perhaps take this even further and try to ask questions and demand answers from the audience. This penetrates the fourth wall strongly and having the audience participate in such a way is very effective in making theatre obvious. This will make the audience think about the social issue more the piece of theatre was not merely something you went to watch and got absorbed in, but rather, a representation of reality. I believe this is an exceedingly effective Brechtian technique.